Research highlights lack of knowledge
Wednesday, 25 March 2009Inevitably perhaps, the BBC and Western Mail’s coverage of the social research published by the All Wales Convention today has focused on the headline figure of 48% who say they would vote Yes in a referendum on giving the Assembly primary law-making powers. This of course is in line with the results of a BBC poll conducted a month ago, though the Convention’s research was actually carried out earlier than that - in November / December 2008.
Unfortunately, little attention has been given to the survey’s other findings, some of which are truly startling in the levels of ignorance of the issue they reveal amongst the public. It is these findings, the most significant of which are outlined below, that really show how steep a hill the Convention has to climb if it is to fulfil its mission of educating the Welsh public about the devolution debate. They also highlight the kind of misinformation that those who favour law-making powers will have to counter if a referendum is to be won, as well as some of the opportunities.
Here are some of the main findings of The All Wales Convention Social Research First Phase, with Cymru Yfory comments in italics.
- * Only 26% of respondents had seen, heard or read something about possible changes to the powers of the Assembly;
This means that three quarters of the Welsh population have no idea that there is a debate going on that will have a profound effect on the way they are governed and on which they will soon be asked to vote. Clearly, this has to change!
- * 48% of respondents incorrectly thought that ‘full law-making powers’ meant that the Assembly would have law-making powers in all areas of Welsh life;
Cymru Yfory has never used the term ‘full law-making powers’ as we belive it gives a misleading impression of what is on offer, and this research shows that to be the case. The Assembly will have primary law-making powers over twenty policy fields, not ‘full law-making powers’. The All Wales Convention and politicians alike should be careful of the terminology they use so as to avoid confusion.
- * In general, once informed on the details of the debate, there was a sense of cautious optimism in the group discussions;
Ignorance of the issue is the greatest barrier to support for greater powers. Overcoming this hurdle is crucial, and in many cases, sufficient.
- * 35% of people know that the Assembly can’t change the basic rate of income tax;
This may be indicative not only of a lack of information about what powers the Assembly currently has, but that in some cases that the assumption is that it has more powers than it does in reality. Many people then do not realise the tight limitations on what the Assembly can currently do and this needs to be better explained.
- * 88% know nothing at all or little about the possible changes to the powers of the Assembly;
It is difficult to know what can be added to this bare statistic. Clearly, a proper debate and an informed choice is impossible when nine out of every ten know next to nothing about the issue in hand and its relevance to them. The Convention and politicians need to up their game in explaining the issue to people.
- * 26% thought it definitely or probably true that ‘full law-making powers’ would mean Wales being independent from the UK. A further 22% responded ‘don’t know’ to this question;
Apart from highlighting again the danger of using the inappropriate term ‘full law-making powers’, it is very concerning that those who wish to confuse the issue by giving the impression that the referendum is about independence are pushing at such an open door. Their dangerous and irresponsible misinformation must be countered. Independence is not on the table. On the positive side, since 94% of people oppose independence we must assume that the vast majority of these 26% would therefore have told the pollsters that they would vote ‘No’ in a referendum, when in fact they might well vote Yes if they knew what it was really about. These 26% then comprise a huge pool of potential Yes voters here if only they could be informed of the real choice facing them.
- * There is a srong correlation between believing Wales should remain part of the UK with its own elected Assembly with limited law-making powers (i.e. a preference for the current settlement) and being undecided about how to vote in a referendum;
This is interesting. A significant proportion of those who expressed a preference for the current settlement also said they were undecided when it came to how to vote in a referendum. Again then, there is a sizable group of ’swing voters’ here who could well support primary law-making powers once the issue is prpoerly explaind to them. Of course, there is probably a significant overlap between this group and those who currently believe the question to be about independence.
The full report can be read here. A second phase of social research will be conducted over the coming months with results to be published by the autumn. Hopefully by then, the Convention will have had some effect on the public’s level of knowledge of the choice facing them.